Sign in

Raise3D - E2 & E2CF Comparison

Raised3D E2CF

Raised3D E2CF

Raise3D

3D printer - FDM

AI summary

Overview of E2 and E2CF 3D Printers

Exploring the realm of 3D printing, two standout models are brought into comparison: the E2 and the E2CF by Raise3D. Both printers cater to different needs within the 3D printing landscape, with the E2 being praised for its versatility and general-purpose use, whereas the E2CF is designed specifically for use with composite materials such as carbon fiber and glass fiber, offering a more focused application for production environments.

Features of E2

The E2 shines as a versatile, general-purpose 3D printer featuring independent dual extruders (IDEX) that enable users to print in clone, duplication, or mirror mode. It supports a wide range of materials, thanks to its flexible bed and fully enclosed design with HEPA filter, making it suitable for printing with high-temperature materials like ABS. Additional convenience features include Wi-Fi connectivity, filament runout sensors, and safety features such as pause-on-door-opening, making it a robust choice for a wide range of printing tasks.

Introduction to E2CF

On the other hand, the E2CF is tailored for printing with abrasive materials straight out of the box, without the need for modifications. It comes equipped with abrasive-resistant, tool steel nozzles and dry boxes for filament storage to manage the hygroscopic nature of nylon materials. This specialization is further supported by software finely tuned for composite materials, streamlining the printing process for carbon fiber and glass fiber materials without requiring manual adjustments to print settings.

Distinguishing Features of E2CF

The most notable differences between the two printers lie in their targeted applications and ease of use with specific materials. The E2CF's inclusion of dry boxes for material storage addresses the challenge of filament moisture absorption, ensuring consistent material quality and printing results, particularly for nylon-based composites. The software provided with the E2CF is optimized for carbon fiber and glass fiber materials, offering a seamless, "closed system" experience that limits the need for manual tweaks.

Output Quality and Post-Processing

Both printers produce high-quality prints, but the E2CF has a specific advantage when it comes to printing strong parts with composite materials. While parts printed on the E2CF are robust, additional post-processing, such as annealing, can further enhance the strength of carbon fiber-printed parts, offering customization based on the desired strength level.

Choosing Between E2 and E2CF

When deciding between the E2 and the E2CF, the choice boils down to the intended use. The E2 offers unparalleled versatility, suitable for prototyping and experimenting with a wide range of materials. In contrast, the E2CF is ideal for production runs where consistent strength and reliability are paramount, especially in applications requiring the unique properties of carbon fiber and glass fiber materials.

Real-World Applications

The E2 fits perfectly in environments where flexibility and a broad material repertoire are necessary, such as in prototyping and design engineering. The E2CF, however, excels in production settings where the superior strength of carbon fiber and glass fiber composites is a requirement, making it ideal for producing end-use parts, jigs, fixtures, and components for industries like aerospace.

Conclusion

In summary, whether the E2CF can serve as the only printer in a setup depends largely on the specific printing needs of the user. Those primarily printing with carbon fiber materials may find the E2CF sufficient, while others may benefit from the versatility of the E2, especially for applications requiring a broader range of materials. For users looking to explore the full spectrum of 3D printing possibilities, possessing both models could offer the best of both worlds, providing both broad material compatibility and specialized high-strength production capabilities.

Proreview 2025